Another Day, Another Let-Down Game
January 26th, 2008 | by The Prowler |I don’t know what it is, but all too often in conference play, after a big win, Pitt has a big let-down game. Tonight’s game against Rutgers proved to be no different. What isn’t surprising is that Pitt had a let-down against a team with only 1 Big East win so far this season. What IS surprising is that this loss came at the Pete, where Pitt has been virtually unbeatable. Even more surprising is that it came on the night celebrating Pitt’s 100th game at the Pete.
This loss makes their 100 game record since the opening of the Peterson Events Center 91-9.
91-9.
How can you be 91-8 at home, and lose to the worst team in the conference? Well, there are two ways. First, lose your point guard to injury. The injury to Levance Fields isn’t an excuse. The 5 starters on the floor for Pitt are better than the 5 starters on the floor for Rutgers, with or without Fields. And Pitt has played very well in his absence. But just like in the Cincinnati game, the problem wasn’t talent on the floor. It was the lack of a true dribbler; a true creator off the dribble who could spread out the defense a little bit and force things to happen that aren’t just being handed to them by the defense.
Second, Pitt seems to play to the caliber of their opponents at times. It is sad, but, at times, they seem to just not play hard as if the opponent they are playing isn’t enough of a threat to bother breaking a sweat against. This is particularly true of Sam Young. Young is a monster whom I love to watch. But sometimes he just saunters across the floor like there is no urgency. You can’t turn intensity on and off in an instant. You have to start the game with it. You have to maintain it. You have to treat every opponent like they are standing between you and a national championship.
Given their lack of point guard and their willingness to play down to poor competition, Pitt has taken what looked like a final four team after the Duke win, and become a team that could just as easily make the final four or not make the NCAA tournament. It would be a shame if Pitt missed the tournament; it would also be a shame if they continued beating good teams and then losing to the bad ones.
I give Rutgers credit. They played good defense, especially in the second half. They shot 53.7% from the floor while holding Pitt to a mere 38.6%. They out-rebounded Pitt by 3, with 27 of those rebounds coming in the second half. Rutgers has something to play for. Nobody wants to be the basement dwellers. Nobody wants to be the doormat. And having lost 8 straight times to Pitt, they certainly had a chip on their shoulder big enough to want to win this one.
But in the end, Pitt had everything they needed to win. They were, and are the better team. If they played 10 times, Pitt would probably win 8 or 9 of them. Pitt has two of the best players in the Big East with DeJuan Blair and Sam Young. Yet somehow they managed another big let-down game. We can only hope that this trend ends soon. Pitt is getting to the meat of their schedule really soon here. In the next 5 games, 4 of them are against Villanova, UConn, WVU, and Marquette. The other is against Providence, who isn’t going to just roll over and play dead. Pitt can’t afford losses to Rutgers and Cincinnati when they still have these other teams on their schedule. It’s time to regroup, man up, and start playing like the team that beat Georgetown by 9 two weeks ago.
Update (1/28/08 12:15 AM): Check out this article from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, written 27 hours after my article, but assessing the play of Sam Young against Rutgers and the dangers of Pitt’s upcoming schedule in the exact same way as I had.
Where was this Sam Young Against Rutgers?

8 Responses to “Another Day, Another Let-Down Game”
By WVU_ftw on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
I posted that rutgers logo on your site during the first half, expecting them to lose. I guess I got my bad-karma payback when Georgetown nailed a 3 on wvu with 6 seconds to go. Then the blocked shot just to add insult to injury… Life in the Big East, right? I think 10 league wins gets you into the Dance. Any less than that you need a good run in Madison square garden. Lookin at Pitt’s schedule, I certainly see 7-8 more wins, putting them at 11-7 or so. WVU might be able to get 10 wins if they could make *HALF* of their free throws.
By pittgirl on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
guess the PPG will be hiring you to write about Pitt? lol
By The Prowler on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
I didn’t see your comment on myspace till after the game, but it was pretty funny. Hey, if Pitt wants to lose to Rutgers, then they will have to tolerate a few jabs until they can redeem themselves.
That is what makes Pitt beating WVU in the Backyard Brawl so sweet. It wasn’t just a loss; it cost WVU a national title chance. So any chance at redemption is far off. Simply winning the next game can’t take away that we stole their title chance out from under them.
13-9
Ain’t life grand.
By WVU_ftw on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
Big East basketball… truly is the toughest conference to excel in. A league where going 9-7 and even 8-8 looks good enough for the NCAAs. Traditional powerhouse teams like UConn, Syracuse, Villanova, Louisville, Marquett, Pitt, Georgetown, and the less storied teams like WVU, Notre Dame, Seton Hall and Providence *all* struggle throughout the season. The top 12 teams all have a shot on any given night. look at UConn going to Bloomington, stealing a rode win against #8 Indiana (the huskies also beat Louisville tonight to tie for 2nd place in the league). Pitt beating #7 Duke at a neutral site and #6 Georgetown at home (which are both marquee wins and will certainly get them into the NCAAs if they get to 9-7 in the league), but losing to schools that might not even make it to the BE tourney. Cinci beating Louisville, Pitt and Villanova but losing to Belmont and Illinois STATE. WVU losing to #5 Tennessee and #9 Georgetown by a combined 3 points- BOTH games WVU had plenty of opportunities to put it away at the free throw line but failed to convert.
I thought the Ewing “block” was a goaltend, and the more I watch the replays the more I see a slight dip in the ball. But let’s be real: WVU had soo many chances to finish the Hoyas off, to make that game out of reach. We make 2 or 3 more free throws and Georgetown is down by 7 with 6 seconds to go and that 3 pointer is meaningless. But Nichols missed a few free throws, butler missed a few, etc etc. It added up to a total of 12 missed. Make 2 more of those and we win… That toughness- the physical, bruising nature of Big East basketball is what makes it so gratifying when your team beats *anyone* on the schedule, especially if they do it on the road! But sadly WVU has no marquee wins right now, and the committee looks at that. So 9-7 with no good road wins will not get you in. WVU needs to beat Pitt at home or else we don’t have a shot
By WVU_ftw on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
one last note: WVU has home wins over Syracuse and #14 Marquett (#11 at the time). Those might be considered *good* wins, if not marquee. We need a win over Pitt, Villanova or UConn. Without a win like that, WVU might need a decent run in Madison Square garden… ::sigh::
By The Prowler on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
The way the Tournament Selection Committee has gone in recent years, marquee wins aren’t as important as scheduling non-conference road games and, in particular, non-conference road games versus good mid-majors. Going on the road to play Radford and Canisius isn’t going to do as much for WVU as going on the road to Dayton does for Pitt, even though WVU won both of those games, and Pitt lost to Dayton. The Selection Committee has shown that they want to see that Major Conference teams will go on the road and/or play good teams that might actually beat them out of conference. WVU’s road games at Tennessee and at Auburn will help, but would have helped more if they had beat Tennessee.
In the past, teams (Syracuse being the best example of it) from the Big East have had the mindset that they have such a tough conference that they should just schedule cupcakes in non-conference. It is true that the Big East is the best and toughest conference top to bottom. It is also true that, unlike the Big Ten, Pac 10, and Big 12, it will be virtually impossible in a given year for a Big East team to plan on going undefeated in conference. Before expanding and adding Louisville and Marquette it was possible. But now, there are just too many tough teams. Everyone beats each other up. Everyone is going to have a few losses. And more and more, weak or middle-of-the road teams in conference beating good teams in conference isn’t converting directly into a quality tournament resume. Pitt’s win over Duke will go much further than their win against Georgetown, even though Duke was 7 and Georgetown was 5 in the polls.
Long story short, teams are being forced to schedule tougher non-conference games. The Big East will get 8-9 teams in the tournament, but in a 16 team league, that means that teams with winning conference records can still be left out.
By WVU_ftw on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
last year was strange because so few made it to the NCAAs. Only 6 big east teams got in, despite Syracuse at 9-7 with quality wins. I think Seton Hall and Cinci both had a case too.
By The Prowler on Jan 28, 2008 | Reply
According to ESPN, the committee was making a statement last year with Syracuse because they played no road non-conference games, and all their games were against Little Sisters of the Poor type schools. Cinci has no quality non-conference wins, so they really need the wins over good Pitt type teams. WVU is in a good position to play themselves in with a few good conference wins because they did have some good non-conference games.
There is no doubt that the conference tournament will help WVU and Cinci if they can win a game or two. Pitt isn’t out of the woods just yet either. They have good wins out of conference and in conference. But they have the hardest part of their schedule coming up and currently only have 16 wins. In all likelihood, they will win 5 more games and be good. But they are playing very tough teams and are still without a point guard.